- Harry – gefangen in der Zeit!
- Mehr «Spass».
- A Kiss for Worlds End - an otherworldly teen romance;
Because the trade in wild animals and plants crosses borders between countries, the effort to regulate it requires international cooperation to safeguard certain species from over-exploitation. CITES was conceived in the spirit of such cooperation. Today, it accords varying degrees of protection to more than 35, species of animals and plants, whether they are traded as live specimens, fur coats or dried herbs. The text of the Convention was finally agreed at a meeting of representatives of 80 countries in Washington, D.
The original of the Convention was deposited with the Depositary Government in the Chinese , English, French , Russian and Spanish languages, each version being equally authentic.
CITES is an international agreement to which States and regional economic integration organizations adhere voluntarily. Although CITES is legally binding on the Parties — in other words they have to implement the Convention — it does not take the place of national laws. Rather it provides a framework to be respected by each Party, which has to adopt its own domestic legislation to ensure that CITES is implemented at the national level. Skip to main content.
News & Announcements
FR ES. Search form Search.
Essential information for applying, implementing and enforcing the Convention. Reporting requirements Annual report Annual Illegal trade report Implementation report Ad hoc reports. Enforcement Introduction Enforcement focal points Wildlife crime linked to the Internet Wildlife forensics. Current activities on selected species and other key topics.
Flora Medicinal plants. Since then, many people have been wondering where else it could be applied.http://savedeo.com/azithromycin-price-online-shipping-to-de.php
29 Beweise, dass es fast unmöglich ist, Deutsch zu lernen
The Internet has always been regarded as a particularly decentralized technology, but this holds no longer true for most services today: All of us use one search engine Google , one social network Facebook and one messenger WhatsApp. And all these services are based on centralized data storage and data processing.
Blockchain technology seems to offer a way out—all services that previously operated via central databases could now be organized with a distributed ledger. The ideas go so far as to depict complex business processes within blockchains.
For example, automated payouts to an account when a stock reaches a certain value. The hype about blockchain is almost as old as the one around Bitcoin, so we are talking about the inevitability of this technology for like six to seven years now. Hundreds, if not thousands of start-ups have been established since then, and just as many applications of the blockchain have been claimed. As an interested observer one asks himself, why there is yet no other popular application besides cryptocurrencies which themselves are more or less speculation bubbles without any real world application?
Why do all blockchain technologies remain in the project phase and none of them finds a market? The answer is that Blockchain is more an ideology than a technology. Ideology means, that it is backed by an idea of how society works and how it should work. One of the oldest problems in social sciences is the question of how to establish trust between strangers. Society will only exist if this problem is adequately resolved. Think of banks, the legal system, parties, media, etc.
Quellen - Literaturverzeichnis von bernrafttarepri.ml
All these institutions bundle trust and thus secure social actions between strangers. However, these institutions gain a certain social power through their central role. This power has always caused a headache to a certain school of thinking: the Libertarians, or anarcho-capitalists. The market — as the sum of all individuals trading with each other — should regulate everything by its own.
Accordingly, they are also very critical of institutions such as central banks that issue currencies. The basic idea behind Bitcoin is to eliminate the central banks — and indeed banks in general — from the equation. Blockchain is the libertarian utopia of a society without institutions. Instead of trusting institutions, we should have confidence in cryptography. Instead of our bank, we should trust in the unbreakability of algorithms. Instead of trusting in Uber or any other taxi app, we should trust a protocol to find us a driver.
So when you invest in Blockchain, you make a bet against trust in institutions. Technically speaking, a blockchain can do the same things any database has long been able to do—with a tendency to less.